I’ve been a little busy elsewhere but haven’t stopped counting down.
In total, Victoria’s public health sector has lost $723 million in the two years since Premier Baillieu took office; 85% of the funding cuts have been initiated by his government – not that you’d know that from the media coverage, government releases, or from the responses of many hospitals.
As the Federal and State governments continue to bicker, despite calls for compromise, it’s our patients who will suffer, and our already pressured staff who will feel the strain.
What do funding cuts mean? Here, off the top of my head and informed by both current practice and my memories of the Kennett years, are a couple of things that have been or will be implemented in hospitals across the state:
- Elective lists, already at 7000, get longer;
- inpatients have to wait for surgery – like the elderly mother of a friend and colleague, who waited three days for surgery to repair a fractured hip, even though research clearly demonstrates that delays increase the already poor outcomes of this population;
- patients are sent home to make room for new admissions, even if they’re not ready for discharge – which not only affects their progress but, if they need to be readmitted, means the hospitals can’t bill for subsequent related admissions;
- nurses are already being asked to work reduced shift lengths and to reduce their total hours, even though patient numbers aren’t decreasing and acuity is only rising;
- fewer allied health services (physiotherapy, nutrition, occupational therapy, speech pathology, podiatry and others) are available, for both in- and out-patients;
- support services like pathology, orderlies and cleaners are reduced, increasing the length of time everything takes to be done;
- kitchen staff are cut, increasing the likelihood of patients getting the wrong meals – for those on modified diets, like people with coeliac disease, diabetes, or who’ve had a stroke, this can have significant ramifications;
- linen deliveries are reduced, making it harder to get blankets when patients are cold, and encouraging wet linen to be covered up with pads rather than changed;
- the process for getting additional services is longer, harder, and requires justification – things like an air mattress for someone at high risk of developing a pressure ulcer, or an attendant to monitor a confused patient at risk of pulling out vital lines, falling out of bed, or wandering out of the ward; and
- structural changes like combining smaller wards to cut the cost of ward-level management, even though that makes it often impossible for staff to be adequately supervised or supported.
Victoria’s nurses, midwives and patients are fortunate – thanks to the sustained, committed work of past and present Australian Nursing Federation (Vic. branch) staff, board, executive and members, we have legally mandated minimum ratios. That means that, regardless of the severity of cuts, public hospitals can not increase patient loads above their current level.
Our world first ratios haven’t changed since they were implemented in 2000, although patients in every region and at every level are not more likely to be sicker and have more concomitant conditions (co-morbidities) now than then. Acknowledging this, some areas in some hospitals staff above the legal minimum – allowing, for example, the night duty in charge nurse to have a reduced patient load instead of caring for eight patients while running the ward. That will change, in almost every instance.
Things could be worse – at least our ratios mean that, unlike the recent cuts at Brisbane’s Prince Charles hospital, combining wards doesn’t mean managing the same number of acute surgical patients with twenty-five fewer nurses.
Victoria votes in a year, ten months, two weeks and four days from now. It’s not just nurses and midwives – none of us can afford to forget the impact that the Baillieu government’s short-sighted cuts are having on the health of our most vulnerable members, and on the functional integrity of what was a smoothly running health system.
In our hospital, A whole 10 bed ward has been closed for three months due to funding cuts.. This ward is linked to theatre, and so elective surgery patients suffer a longer wait… the staff have to have their cntracted hours honoured, so they will be doing pool shifts, which has a flow on affect for those of us who rely predominantly on pool shifts..
About 80-90 bed being closed within my health service. Theaters not re-opening, and staff who were on contracts are not being renewed. And now a possibility of closing an emergency department at night time. All due to funding or lack there of. Hummm where’s the media out cry of putting the public at risk????
I know – where’s the media in this?
New health agreement was signed in Aug 2011. Details of new funding arrangement gone over with a fine tooth comb so Premiers/Health Ministers would understand new way ABS were modelling population growth. Baillieu happily signed up and bragged about what a great deal it was “better than the one John Brumby got”. They new exactly how the ABS modelling would work, if they didnt they wouldnt have signed up. Now new funding model being put in practice Baillieu is complaining. This ispurely political because LNP doing so badly in Vic and its a fed election year….trying to make Fed Labor look bad and themselves look good. Wont work. Dont let it work. Patients are suffering. Davis could fix this if he wanted to.
Reblogged this on Denise Allen and commented:
Great post!
Queensland, NSW, Victoria. All excellent examples of the behaviour to expect from Phoney Tony and his NO Coalition if they end up as the Federal Government of this country.
If they do I shall have two responses to those who then complain.
1) Don’t look at me, I didn’t vote for them.
2) If you did vote for them you only have yourselves to blame. So stop whingeing and live with your decision!